El Pacto por el Euro Plus o la muerte del keynesianismo en Europa

El Pacto por el Euro Plus o la muerte del keynesianismo en Europa: "Durante muchos años los europeístas hemos defendido la necesidad de caminar hacia un gobierno económico europeo. Ahora parece que estamos más cerca de conseguirlo, pero a costa de renunciar a una de las señas de identidad de la Europa de la segunda mitad del siglo XX, el keynesianismo económico, que tanto bien ha hecho a las políticas sociales y al estado del bienestar.
Con las conclusiones del"

El Leviatán existe: vive en Bruselas (Article)

El Leviatán existe: vive en Bruselas (Article): "Las instituciones europeas son una hidra de papel que devora a los ciudadanos, afirma en su última obra el ensayista alemán Hans-Magnus Enzesberger, que insta a los europeos a plantarles cara. (Article)"

Anuario Galicia-Norte Portugal 2010

Anuario Galicia-Norte Portugal 2010: "¡Por fin lo he conseguido! Desde que conocí la noticia de la nueva edición del anuario estadístico Galicia-Norte de Portugal 2010 en el pasado mes de diciembre, lo he estado buscando en la web con el fin de compartirlo, y hasta hoy no lo había encontrado. Por tanto, lo primero que voy a hacer es [...]"

Innovación y participación ciudadana

Innovación y participación ciudadana: "Os propongo una reflexión que hace tiempo que persigo (o que me persigue), se trata de la relación entre innovación y participación ciudadana. Casi siempre se entiende la participación ciudadana desde su lado más político y pocas veces persiguiendo la participación ciudadana como experiencias (que es preciso observar) , como conocimiento y no simplemente como opinión. La innovación en la"

Everything You Need to Know About Open Innovation

Everything You Need to Know About Open Innovation: "

Open innovation is a concept I originated that falls directly in that gap between business and academe. Conceptually, it is a more distributed, more participatory, more decentralized approach to innovation, based on the observed fact that useful knowledge today is widely distributed, and no company, no matter how capable or how big, could innovate effectively on its own. Yet at the same time there is a critical role for an overarching architecture that connects these seemingly disparate activities together. And the business model (which itself can be innovated) determines what companies look to bring inside the firm and allow to go outside the firm. So open innovation supplies a lot for academics to study, and there have been literally hundreds of academic papers written now on this topic in the past 8 years. For business, open innovation is a more profitable way to innovate, because it can reduce costs, accelerate time to market, increase differentiation in the market, and create new revenue streams for the company. So there’s a lot of opportunity for business to profit from open innovation.

Click here to continue reading this column on Forbes.com.

"

The ideal of multiculturalism: Rest in Peace?

The ideal of multiculturalism: Rest in Peace?: "

Author: Christopher Houtkamp (Board-member & Web-editor European Student Think Tank)

Multiculturalism is dead. At least, according to many prominent EU-leaders. It’s a shame though, that they didn’t present a feasible alternative to the multicultural society. Should we say our permanent farewells to the multicultural ideal, or should we instead try to reform it, giving it a chance to survive? I’ll try to answer that question below.

The last few months we have seen a trend among conservative politicians to sharply distance themselves from the multicultural ideal. Chancellor Merkel of Germany opened the ball by saying that the thought of multiculturalism in Germany “ist absolut gescheitert”. UK’s prime-minister Cameron soon followed, declaring that “state multiculturalism” has failed. Naturally the French president Sarkozy didn’t wish to be left behind: he declared roughly the same as his conservative colleagues. And yes, even in my own small country, the Netherlands, our conservative-liberal Prime Minister Rutte buried ‘multi-culti’ in the cemetery of failed ideas, for good.

Why the politicians aren’t entirely wrong

The different government leaders formulated their death declarations in various ways, but the core of their criticism is roughly the same. We as north-western European countries made a grave mistake in the 1960’s, 70’s and 80’s, to think that immigrants with a wholly different cultural background could easily integrate, with little government intervention, in our societies. According to them, the opposite is true: immigrants don’t learn the host country’s language, sometimes absolutely refuse to respect the dominant cultural norms and are in the worst case the root of many social problems. Despite the fact that the statistics, at least in the Netherlands, nuance that image a bit (according to the hard facts, the process of integration in terms of socio-economic participation is going smoother than ever before), it’s hard to completely deny their statements. There are indeed many segregated districts in the big European cities, where the majority of inhabitants is of non-western origin. I also know stories of people that had a couple of Muslims living above them in a flat. Sometimes the Muslims felt the need to initiate a ritual slaughter, killing for example a goat without anaesthetic. The blood then seeped down from the bars of the balcony. You might understand that integration under such circumstances tends to be a bit difficult.

Robert Putnam on ‘multi-culti’

In his article E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century the famous political scientist Robert Putnam does some research on the effect of ethnic diversity on social capital. By social capital I mean the extent of an individual’s network and the amount of participation within social activities. For example, an individual that participates in various sport-clubs and volunteering work has much more social capital than another who never sees a soul. Anyway, Putnam found that, on the short term, in all ethnic divers (or ‘multicultural’) neighbourhoods the amount of social capital was at an all-time low, both for natives and immigrants. Integration is then evidently practically impossible, because it requires at least an intensive interaction between native and immigrant communities to be successful. In that sense Putnam’s research confirms the statements of the four government leaders I mentioned before: different cultures can’t effortlessly live together. The sad message he has for the politicians is that government policy alone can’t make integration work. Sure, if you’re a policymaker you should let the immigrants learn the dominant language and provide for the necessary conditions to improve the interaction between natives and non-natives, but integration is foremost a time consuming process. It’s an absolute illusion to think that if you let immigrants pass a citizenship course, which is basically just a language course, and ‘release’ them in our society with minimal knowledge of our language and culture, that they will be able to instantly participate as if they were natives. It takes time for every person to adapt to a new culture. And it’s worthwhile to take that time: Putnam emphasises the enormous positive boost immigration gives on the long term. Immigrants give a country a kind of dynamism, by presenting new fresh ideas. Putnam clearly argues that the West needs immigrants to not completely lose its leading position on the world stage. His arguments in this regard are roughly the same as Amy Chua’s, whose ideas I’ve discussed in a previous blog (http://studentthinktank.eu/blogs/beyond-intolerance-and-xenophobia-a-plea-for-a-liberal-labour-immigration-policy/).

The task of Europe’s leaders

Declaring the ideal of multiculturalism dead while not presenting a feasible alternative is not only a bit odd, but also, on the long term, plain foolish. It’s a fact that we live in a multi-cultural society and we should try to deal with it the best way we can. I do realise however that the ideal is in dire need of reform. As long as we don’t think it’s the panacea for all the integration diseases, I advocate that all immigrants do an easy citizenship course before coming to Europe and finish it when they are finally here. Scientific research has proven that the chances of successful integration will then increase. But that’s basically all a government can do. For the rest our different leaders, and maybe even the EU as a whole, should try to formulate a convincing set of values and beliefs that binds ‘us natives’ all. That way the immigrants have a clear idea what kind of values they need to respect, and maybe even make their own. But it’s more importantly to actively live up to them. In Holland for example, we have a fundamentalist protestant-Christian party in the parliament (the SGP) that seeks to install a theocracy and discriminates women, while we at the same time condemn the fundamentalist Muslims for advocating exactly the same. I believe that if we both add this ‘value’ ingredient to our multi-cultural recipe (however hard that may be, I’m aware of that) and present the new immigrants with even more opportunities to help them with their integration, then a reformed multi-cultural ideal should be able to survive.

Literature:

Putnam, R (2007) ‘E pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century in Scandinavian Political Studies 30(2) pp. 137-174

"

GUÍA DE FUENTES DE INFORMACIÓN DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA Y ORGANISMOS INTERNACIONALES (CDE).

GUÍA DE FUENTES DE INFORMACIÓN DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA Y ORGANISMOS INTERNACIONALES (CDE).: "
Joaquim Millan
Eurolocal

GUÍA DE FUENTES DE INFORMACIÓN DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA Y ORGANISMOS INTERNACIONALES

Esta guía, elaborada por el Centro de Documentación Europea y el Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales de la Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, es de particular importancia y utilidad. Los lectores tienen entre sus manos una herramienta que les ayudará a aproximarse al funcionamiento de las instituciones, no solamente europeas, sino también de organismos internacionales. Este manual es un excelente instrumento que, estoy convencido, contribuirá a aportar claridad y transparencia en las labores de los usuarios.

+ INFO: Centro de Documentación Europea de la Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (tlf.: 917091400 ext. 1551 / cde@ufv.es ).

LINK: http://www.ufv.es/inicio/publicaciones-del-cde_317

"